Open energy system models (Ofer Abarbanel online library)

Open energy system models are energy system models that are open source.[a] However, some of them may use third party proprietary software as part of their workflows to input, process, or output data. Preferably, these models use open data, which facilitates open science.

Energy system models are used to explore future energy systems and are often applied to questions involving energy and climate policy. The models themselves vary widely in terms of their type, design, programming, application, scope, level of detail, sophistication, and shortcomings. For many models, some form of mathematical optimization is used to inform the solution process.

General considerations


The open energy modeling projects listed here fall exclusively within the bottom-up paradigm, in which a model is a relatively literal representation of the underlying system.

Several drivers favor the development of open models and open data. There is an increasing interest in making public policy energy models more transparent to improve their acceptance by policymakers and the public.[1] There is also a desire to leverage the benefits that open data and open software development can bring, including reduced duplication of effort, better sharing of ideas and information, improved quality, and wider engagement and adoption.[2] Model development is therefore usually a team effort and constituted as either an academic project, a commercial venture, or a genuinely inclusive community initiative.

This article does not cover projects which simply make their source code or spreadsheets available for public download, but which omit a recognized free and open-source software license. The absence of a license agreement creates a state of legal uncertainty whereby potential users cannot know which limitations the owner may want to enforce in the future.[3]:1 The projects listed here are deemed suitable for inclusion through having pending or published academic literature or by being reported in secondary sources.

A 2017 paper lists the benefits of open data and models and discusses the reasons that many projects nonetheless remain closed.[4]:211–213 The paper makes a number of recommendations for projects wishing to transition to a more open approach.[4]:214 The authors also conclude that, in terms of openness, energy research has lagged behind other fields, most notably physics, biotechnology, and medicine.[4]:213–214


Open energy system modeling came of age in the 2010s. Just two projects were cited in a 2011 paper on the topic: OSeMOSYS and TEMOA.[5]:5861 Balmorel was also active at that time, having been made public in 2001.[b] As of March 2017, this article lists 25 such undertakings (with a further six waiting to be added).

Transparency, comprehensibility, and reproducibility

See also: Open Energy Modelling Initiative § Context

The use of open energy system models and open energy data represents one attempt to improve the transparency, comprehensibility, and reproducibility of energy system models, particularly those used to aid public policy development.[1]

A 2010 paper concerning energy efficiency modeling argues that “an open peer review process can greatly support model verification and validation, which are essential for model development”.[6]:17[7] To further honor the process of peer review, researchers argue, in a 2012 paper, that it is essential to place both the source code and datasets under publicly accessible version control so that third-parties can run, verify, and scrutinize specific models.[8] A 2016 paper contends that model-based energy scenario studies, seeking to influence decision-makers in government and industry, must become more comprehensible and more transparent. To these ends, the paper provides a checklist of transparency criteria that should be completed by modelers. The authors however state that they “consider open source approaches to be an extreme case of transparency that does not automatically facilitate the comprehensibility of studies for policy advice.”[9]:4

A one-page opinion piece from 2017 advances the case for using open energy data and modeling to build public trust in policy analysis. The article also argues that scientific journals have a responsibility to require that data and code be submitted alongside text for peer review.[10]

State projects

State-sponsored open source projects in any domain are a relatively new phenomena.

As of 2017, the European Commission now supports several open source energy system modeling projects to aid the transition to a low-carbon energy system for Europe. The Dispa-SET project (below) is modeling the European electricity system and hosts its codebase on GitHub. The MEDEAS project, which will design and implement a new open source energy-economy model for Europe, held its kick-off meeting in February 2016.[11]:6[12] As of February 2017, the project had yet to publish any source code. The established OSeMOSYS project (below) is developing a multi-sector energy model for Europe with Commission funding to support stakeholder outreach.[13] The flagship JRC-EU-TIMES model however remains closed source.[14]

The United States NEMS national model is available but nonetheless difficult to use. NEMS does not classify as an open source project in the accepted sense.[10]

Electricity sector models

Open electricity sector models are confined to just the electricity sector. These models invariably have a temporal resolution of one hour or less. Some models concentrate on the engineering characteristics of the system, including a good representation of high-voltage transmission networks and AC power flow. Others models depict electricity spot markets and are known as dispatch models. While other models embed autonomous agents to capture, for instance, bidding decisions using techniques from bounded rationality. The ability to handle variable renewable energy, transmission systems, and grid storage are becoming important considerations.

Open electricity sector models
Project Host License Access Coding Documentation Scope/type
DIETER DIW Berlin MIT download GAMS publication dispatch and investment
Dispa-SET EC Joint Research Centre EUPL 1.1 GitHub GAMS, Python website European transmission and dispatch
EMLab-Generation Delft University of Technology Apache 2.0 GitHub Java manual, website agent-based
EMMA Neon Neue Energieökonomik CC BY-SA 3.0 download GAMS website electricity market
GENESYS RWTH Aachen University LGPLv2.1 on application C++ website European electricity system
NEMO University of New South Wales GPLv3 git repository Python website, list Australian NEM market
OnSSET KTH Royal Institute of Technology MIT GitHub Python website, GitHub cost-effective electrification
pandapower ·         University of Kassel

·         Fraunhofer Institute IEE

BSD-new GitHub Python website automated power system analysis
PowerMatcher Flexiblepower Alliance Network Apache 2.0 GitHub Java website smart grid
renpass University of Flensburg GPLv3 by invitation R, MySQL manual renewables pathways
SciGRID DLR Institute of Networked Energy Systems Apache 2.0 git repository Python website, newsletter European transmission grid
SIREN Sustainable Energy Now AGPLv3 GitHub Python website renewable generation
SWITCH University of Hawai’i Apache 2.0 GitHub Python website optimal planning
URBS Technical University of Munich GPLv3 GitHub Python website distributed energy systems
·         Access refers to the methods offered for accessing the codebase.


DIETER stands for Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables. DIETER is a dispatch and investment model. It was first used to study the role of power storage and other flexibility options in a future greenfield setting with high shares of renewable generation. DIETER is being developed at the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin, Germany. The codebase and datasets for Germany can be downloaded from the project website. The basic model is fully described in a DIW working paper and a journal article.[15][16] DIETER is written in GAMS and was developed using the CPLEX commercial solver.

DIETER is framed as a pure linear (no integer variables) cost minimization problem. In the initial formulation, the decision variables include the investment in and dispatch of generation, storage, and DSM capacities in the German wholesale and balancing electricity markets. Later model extensions include vehicle-to-grid interactions and prosumage of solar electricity.[17][18]

The first study using DIETER examines the power storage requirements for renewables uptake ranging from 60% to 100%. Under the baseline scenario of 80% (the lower bound German government target for 2050), grid storage requirements remain moderate and other options on both the supply side and demand side offer flexibility at low cost. Nonetheless storage plays an important role in the provision of reserves. Storage becomes more pronounced under higher shares of renewables, but strongly depends on the costs and availability of other flexibility options, particularly biomass availability.[19]


Under development at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), Petten, the Netherlands, Dispa-SET is a unit commitment and dispatch model intended primarily for Europe. It is written in Python (with Pyomo) and GAMS and uses Python for data processing. A valid GAMS license is required. The model is formulated as a mixed integer problem and JRC uses the proprietary CPLEX sover although open source libraries may also be deployed. Technical descriptions are available for versions 2.0 [20] and 2.1.[21] Dispa-SET is hosted on GitHub, together with a trial dataset, and third-party contributions are encouraged. The codebase has been tested on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Online documentation is available.[22]

The SET in the project name refers to the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan), which seeks to make Europe a leader in energy technologies that can fulfill future (2020 and 2050) energy and climate targets. Energy system modeling, in various forms, is central to this European Commission initiative.[23]

The model power system is managed by a single operator with full knowledge of the economic and technical characteristics of the generation units, the loads at each node, and the heavily simplified transmission network. Demand is deemed fully inelastic. The system is subject to intra-period and inter-period unit commitment constraints (the latter covering nuclear and thermal generation for the most part) and operated under economic dispatch.[21]:4 Hourly data is used and the simulation horizon is normally one year. But to ensure the model remains tractable, two day rolling horizon optimization is employed. The model advances in steps of one day, optimizing the next 48 hours ahead but retaining results for just the first 24 hours.[21]:14–15

Two related publications describe the role and representation of flexibility measures within power systems facing ever greater shares of variable renewable energy (VRE).[24][25] These flexibility measures comprise: dispatchable generation (with constraints on efficiency, ramp rate, part load, and up and down times), conventional storage (predominantly pumped-storage hydro), cross-border interconnectors, demand side management, renewables curtailment, last resort load shedding, and nascent power-to-X solutions (with X being gas, heat, or mobility). The modeler can set a target for renewables and place caps on CO
2 and other pollutants.[21] Planned extensions to the software include support for simplified AC power flow [c] (transmission is currently treated as a transportation problem), new constraints (like cooling water supply), stochastic scenarios, and the inclusion of markets for ancillary services.[22]

Dispa-SET has been or is being applied to case studies in Belgium, Bolivia, Greece, Ireland, and the Netherlands. A 2014 Belgium study investigates what if scenarios for different mixes of nuclear generation, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant, and VRE and finds that the CCGT plants are subject to more aggressive cycling as renewable generation penetrates.[27]


EMLab-Generation is an agent-based model covering two interconnected electricity markets – be they two adjoining countries or two groups of countries. The software is being developed at the Energy Modelling Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. A factsheet is available.[28] And software documentation is available.[29] EMLab-Generation is written in Java.

EMLab-Generation simulates the actions of power companies investing in generation capacity and uses this to explore the long-term effects of various energy and climate protection policies. These policies may target renewable generation, CO
2 emissions, security of supply, and/or energy affordability. The power companies are the main agents: they bid into power markets and they invest based on the net present value (NPV) of prospective power plant projects. They can adopt a variety of technologies, using scenarios from the 2011 IEA World Energy Outlook.[30] The agent-based methodology enables different sets of assumptions to be tested, such as the heterogeneity of actors, the consequences of imperfect expectations, and the behavior of investors outside of ideal conditions.

EMLab-Generation offers a new way of modeling the effects of public policy on electricity markets. It can provide insights into actor and system behaviors over time – including such things as investment cycles, abatement cycles, delayed responses, and the effects of uncertainty and risk on investment decisions.

A 2014 study using EMLab-Generation investigates the effects of introducing floor and ceiling prices for CO
2 under the EU ETS. And in particular, their influence on the dynamic investment pathway of two interlinked electricity markets (loosely Great Britain and Central Western Europe). The study finds a common, moderate CO
2 auction reserve price results in a more continuous decarbonisation pathway and reduces CO
2 price volatility. Adding a ceiling price can shield consumers from extreme price shocks. Such price restrictions should not lead to an overshoot of emissions targets in the long-run.[31]


EMMA is the European Electricity Market Model. It is a techno-economic model covering the integrated Northwestern European power system. EMMA is being developed by the energy economics consultancy Neon Neue Energieökonomik, Berlin, Germany. The source code and datasets can be downloaded from the project website. A manual is available.[32] EMMA is written in GAMS and uses the CPLEX commercial solver.

EMMA models electricity dispatch and investment, minimizing the total cost with respect to investment, generation, and trades between market areas. In economic terms, EMMA classifies as a partial equilibrium model of the wholesale electricity market with a focus on the supply-side. EMMA identifies short-term or long-term optima (or equilibria) and estimates the corresponding capacity mix, hourly prices, dispatch, and cross-border trading. Technically, EMMA is a pure linear program (no integer variables) with about two million non-zero variables. As of 2016, the model covers Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Poland and supports conventional generation, renewable generation, and cogeneration.[32][33]

EMMA has been used to study the economic effects of the increasing penetration of variable renewable energy (VRE), specifically solar power and wind power, in the Northwestern European power system. A 2013 study finds that increasing VRE shares will depress prices and, as a consequence, the competitive large-scale deployment of renewable generation will be more difficult to accomplish than many anticipate.[34] A 2015 study estimates the welfare-optimal market share for wind and solar power. For wind, this is 20%, three-fold more than at present.[35]

An independent 2015 study reviews the EMMA model and comments on the high assumed specific costs for renewable investments.[15]:6


GENESYS stands for Genetic Optimisation of a European Energy Supply System. The software is being developed jointly by the Institute of Power Systems and Power Economics (IAEW) and the Institute for Power Electronics and Electrical Drives (ISEA), both of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. The project maintains a website where potential users can request access to the codebase and the dataset for the 2050 base scenario only.[36] Detailed descriptions of the software are available.[37][38] GENESYS is written in C++ and uses Boost libraries, the MySQL relational database, the Qt 4 application framework, and optionally the CPLEX solver.

The GENESYS simulation tool is designed to optimize a future EUMENA (Europe, Middle East, and North Africa) power system and assumes a high share of renewable generation. It is able to find an economically optimal distribution of generator, storage, and transmission capacities within a 21 region EUMENA. It allows for the optimization of this energy system in combination with an evolutionary method. The optimization is based on a covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), while the operation is simulated as a hierarchical set-up of system elements which balance the load between the various regions at minimum cost using the network simplex algorithm. GENESYS ships with a set of input time series and a set of parameters for the year 2050, which the user can modify.

A future EUMENA energy supply system with a high share of renewable energy sources (RES) will need a strongly interconnected energy transport grid and significant energy storage capacities. GENESYS was used to dimension the storage and transmission between the 21 different regions. Under the assumption of 100% self-supply, about 2500 GW of RES in total and a storage capacity of about 240000 GWh are needed, corresponding to 6% of the annual energy demand, and a HVDC transmission grid of 375000 GW·km. The combined cost estimate for generation, storage, and transmission, excluding distribution, is 6.87 ¢/kWh.[37]

A 2016 study looked at the relationship between storage and transmission capacity under high shares of renewable energy sources (RES) in an EUMENA power system. It found that, up to a certain extent, transmission capacity and storage capacity can substitute for each other. For a transition to a fully renewable energy system by 2050, major structural changes are required. The results indicate the optimal allocation of photovoltaics and wind power, the resulting demand for storage capacities of different technologies (battery, pumped hydro, and hydrogen storage) and the capacity of the transmission grid.[38]


NEMO, the National Electricity Market Optimiser, is a chronological dispatch model for testing and optimizing different portfolios of conventional and renewable electricity generation technologies. It applies solely to the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM), which, despite its name, is limited to east and south Australia. NEMO has been in development at the Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia since 2011.[39] The project maintains a small website and runs an email list. NEMO is written in Python. NEMO itself is described in two publications.[40]:sec 2[41]:sec 2 The data sources are also noted.[40]:sec 3 Optimizations are carried out using a single-objective evaluation function, with penalties. The solution space of generator capacities is searched using the CMA-ES (covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy) algorithm. The timestep is arbitrary but one hour is normally employed.

NEMO has been used to explore generation options for the year 2030 under a variety of renewable energy (RE) and abated fossil fuel technology scenarios. A 2012 study investigates the feasibility of a fully renewable system using concentrated solar power (CSP) with thermal storage, windfarms, photovoltaics, existing hydroelectricity, and biofuelled gas turbines. A number of potential systems, which also meet NEM reliability criteria, are identified. The principal challenge is servicing peak demand on winter evenings following overcast days and periods of low wind.[40] A 2014 study investigates three scenarios using coal-fired thermal generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and gas-fired gas turbines with and without capture. These scenarios are compared to the 2012 analysis using fully renewable generation. The study finds that “only under a few, and seemingly unlikely, combinations of costs can any of the fossil fuel scenarios compete economically with 100% renewable electricity in a carbon constrained world”.[42]:196 A 2016 study evaluates the incremental costs of increasing renewable energy shares under a range of greenhouse gas caps and carbon prices. The study finds that incremental costs increase linearly from zero to 80% RE and then escalate moderately. The study concludes that this cost escalation is not a sufficient reason to avoid renewables targets of 100%.[41]


OnSSET is the OpeN Source Spatial Electrification Toolkit. OnSSET is being developed by the Energy Systems Analysis Group (dESA), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. The software is used to examine areas not served by grid-based electricity and identify the technology options and investment requirements that will provide least-cost access to electricity services. OnSSET is designed to support the United Nations’ SDG 7: the provision of affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. The Python implementation of the toolkit is known as PyOnSSET and was released on 26 November 2016. PyOnSSET does not ship with data, but suitable datasets are available from The project maintains a website and hosts a forum on Reddit.[43][44][45]

OnSSET can estimate, analyze, and visualize the most cost-effective electrification access options, be they conventional grid, mini-grid, or stand-alone.[46] The toolkit supports a range of conventional and renewable energy technologies, including photovoltaics, wind turbines, and small hydro generation. As of 2017, bioenergy and hybrid technologies, such as wind-diesel, are being added.

OnSSET utilizes energy and geographic information, the latter may include settlement size and location, existing and planned transmission and generation infrastructure, economic activity, renewable energy resources, roading networks, and nighttime lighting needs. The GIS information can be supported using the proprietary ArcGIS package or an open source equivalent such as GRASS or QGIS.[47]

OnSSET has been used for case studies in Afghanistan,[48] Bolivia,[49] Ethiopia,[46][50] Nigeria,[46][51] and Tanzania.[47] OnSSET has also been applied in India, Kenya, and Zimbabwe. In addition, continental studies have been carried out for Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.[52] As of 2017, there are plans to apply OnSSET in developing Asia, to increase the resolution of the analysis, and to extend support for various productive uses of electricity.

OnSSET results have contributed to the IEA World Energy Outlook reports for 2014 [53] and 2015,[54] the World Bank Global Tracking Framework report in 2015,[55] and the IEA Africa Energy Outlook report in 2019.[56]


pandapower is a power system analysis and optimization program being jointly developed by the Energy Management and Power System Operation research group, University of Kassel and the Department for Distribution System Operation, Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology (IEE), both of Kassel, Germany. The codebase is hosted on GitHub and is also available as a package. The project maintains a website, an emailing list, and online documentation. pandapower is written in Python. It uses the pandas library for data manipulation and analysis and the PYPOWER library [57] to solve for power flow. Unlike some open source power system tools, pandapower does not depend on proprietary platforms like MATLAB.

pandapower supports the automated analysis and optimization of distribution and transmission networks. This allows a large of number of scenarios to be explored, based on different future grid configurations and technologies. pandapower offers a collection of power system elements, including: lines, 2-winding transformers, 3-winding transformers, and ward-equivalents. It also contains a switch model that allows the modeling of ideal bus-bus switches as well as bus-line/bus-trafo switches. The software supports topological searching. The network itself can be plotted, with or without geographical information, using the matplotlib and plotly libraries.

A 2016 publication evaluates the usefulness of the software by undertaking several case studies with major distribution system operators (DSO). These studies examine the integration of increasing levels of photovoltaics into existing distribution grids. The study concludes that being able to test a large number of detailed scenarios is essential for robust grid planning. Notwithstanding, issues of data availability and problem dimensionality will continue to present challenges.[58]

A 2018 paper describes the package and its design and provides an example case study. The article explains how users work with an element-based model (EBM) which is converted internally to a bus-branch model (BBM) for computation. The package supports power system simulation, optimal power flow calculations (cost information is required), state estimation (should the system characterization lacks fidelity), and graph-based network analysis. The case study shows how a few tens of lines of scripting can interface with pandapower to advance the design of a system subject to diverse operating requirements. The associated code is hosted on GitHub as jupyter notebooks.[59]

As of 2018, BNetzA, the German network regulator, is using pandapower for automated grid analysis.[60] Energy research institutes in Germany are also following the development of pandapower.[61]:90


The PowerMatcher software implements a smart grid coordination mechanism which balances distributed energy resources (DER) and flexible loads through autonomous bidding. The project is managed by the Flexiblepower Alliance Network (FAN) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The project maintains a website and the source code is hosted on GitHub. As of June 2016, existing datasets are not available. PowerMatcher is written in Java.

Each device in the smart grid system – whether a washing machine, a wind generator, or an industrial turbine – expresses its willingness to consume or produce electricity in the form of a bid. These bids are then collected and used to determine an equilibrium price. The PowerMatcher software thereby allows high shares of renewable energy to be integrated into existing electricity systems and should also avoid any local overloading in possibly aging distribution networks.[62]


renpass is an acronym for Renewable Energy Pathways Simulation System. renpass is a simulation electricity model with high regional and temporal resolution, designed to capture existing systems and future systems with up to 100% renewable generation. The software is being developed by the Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems (CSES or ZNES), University of Flensburg, Germany. The project runs a website, from where the codebase can be download. renpass is written in R and links to a MySQL database. A PDF manual is available.[63] renpass is also described in a PhD thesis.[64] As of 2015, renpass is being extended as renpassG!S, based on oemof.

renpass is an electricity dispatch model which minimizes system costs for each time step (optimization) within the limits of a given infrastructure (simulation). Time steps are optionally 15 minutes or one hour. The method assumes perfect foresight. renpass supports the electricity systems found in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The optimization problem for each time step is to minimize the electricity supply cost using the existing power plant fleet for all regions. After this regional dispatch, the exchange between the regions is carried out and is restricted by the grid capacity. This latter problem is solved with a heuristic procedure rather than calculated deterministically. The input is the merit order, the marginal power plant, the excess energy (renewable energy that could be curtailed), and the excess demand (the demand that cannot be supplied) for each region. The exchange algorithm seeks the least cost for all regions, thus the target function is to minimize the total costs of all regions, given the existing grid infrastructure, storage, and generating capacities. The total cost is defined as the residual load multiplied by the price in each region, summed over all regions.

A 2012 study uses renpass to examine the feasibility of a 100% renewable electricity system for the Baltic Sea region (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Sweden) in the year 2050. The base scenario presumes conservative renewable potentials and grid enhancements, a 20% drop in demand, a moderate uptake of storage options, and the deployment of biomass for flexible generation. The study finds that a 100% renewable electricity system is possible, albeit with occasional imports from abutting countries, and that biomass plays a key role in system stability. The costs for this transition are estimated at 50 €/MWh.[65] A 2014 study uses renpass to model Germany and its neighbors.[66] A 2014 thesis uses renpass to examine the benefits of both a new cable between Germany and Norway and new pumped storage capacity in Norway, given 100% renewable electricity systems in both countries.[67] Another 2014 study uses renpass to examine the German Energiewende, the transition to a sustainable energy system for Germany. The study also argues that the public trust needed to underpin such a transition can only be built through the use of transparent open source energy models.[68]


SciGRID, short for Scientific Grid, is an open source model of the German and European electricity transmission networks. The research project is managed by DLR Institute of Networked Energy Systems located in Oldenburg, Germany. The project maintains a website and an email newsletter. SciGRID is written in Python and uses a PostgreSQL database. The first release (v0.1) was made on 15 June 2015.

SciGRID aims to rectify the lack of open research data on the structure of electricity transmission networks within Europe. This lack of data frustrates attempts to build, characterise, and compare high resolution energy system models. SciGRID utilizes transmission network data available from the OpenStreetMap project, available under the Open Database License (ODbL), to automatically author transmission connections. SciGRID will not use data from closed sources. SciGRID can also mathematically decompose a given network into a simpler representation for use in energy models.[69][70]

A related project is GridKit, released under an MIT license. GridKit is being developed to investigate the possibility of a ‘heuristic’ analysis to augment the route-based analysis used in SciGRID. Data is available for network models of the European and North-American high-voltage electricity grids.[71]


SIREN stands for SEN Integrated Renewable Energy Network Toolkit. The project is run by Sustainable Energy Now, an NGO based in Perth, Australia. The project maintains a website. SIREN runs on Windows and the source code is hosted on SourceForge. The software is written in Python and uses the SAM model (System Advisor Model) from the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory to perform energy calculations. SIREN uses hourly datasets to model a given geographic region. Users can use the software to explore the location and scale of renewable energy sources to meet a specified electricity demand. SIREN utilizes a number of open or publicly available data sources: maps can be created from OpenStreetMap tiles and weather datasets can be created using NASA MERRA-2 satellite data.[d][72]

A 2016 study using SIREN to analyze Western Australia’s South-West Interconnected System (SWIS) finds that it can transition to 85% renewable energy (RE) for the same cost as new coal and gas. In addition, 11.1 million tonnes of CO
2eq emissions would be avoided. The modeling assumes a carbon price of AUD $30/tCO
2. Further scenarios examine the goal of 100% renewable generation.[73]


SWITCH is a loose acronym for solar, wind, conventional and hydroelectric generation, and transmission. SWITCH is an optimal planning model for power systems with large shares of renewable energy. SWITCH is being developed by the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawai’i, Mānoa, Hawaii, USA. The project runs a small website and hosts its codebase and datasets on GitHub. SWITCH is written in Pyomo, an optimization components library programmed in Python. It can use either the open source GLPK solver or the commercial CPLEX and Gurobi solvers.

SWITCH is a power system model, focused on renewables integration. It can identify which generator and transmission projects to build in order to satisfy electricity demand at the lowest cost over a several year period while also reducing CO
2 emissions. SWITCH utilizes multi-stage stochastic linear optimization with the objective of minimizing the present value of the cost of power plants, transmission capacity, fuel usage, and an arbitrary per-tonne CO
2 charge (to represent either a carbon tax or a certificate price), over the course of a multi-year investment period. It has two major sets of decision variables. First, at the start of each investment period, SWITCH selects how much generation capacity to build in each of several geographic load zones, how much power transfer capability to add between these zones, and whether to operate existing generation capacity during the investment period or to temporarily mothball it to avoid fixed operation and maintenance costs. Second, for a set of sample days within each investment period, SWITCH makes hourly decisions about how much power to generate from each dispatchable power plant, store at each pumped hydro facility, or transfer along each transmission interconnector. The system must also ensure enough generation and transmission capacity to provide a planning reserve margin of 15% above the load forecasts. For each sampled hour, SWITCH uses electricity demand and renewable power production based on actual measurements, so that the weather-driven correlations between these elements remain intact.

Following the optimization phase, SWITCH is used in a second phase to test the proposed investment plan against a more complete set of weather conditions and to add backstop generation capacity so that the planning reserve margin is always met. Finally, in a third phase, the costs are calculated by freezing the investment plan and operating the proposed power system over a full set of weather conditions.

A 2012 paper uses California from 2012 to 2027 as a case study for SWITCH. The study finds that there is no ceiling on the amount of wind and solar power that could be used and that these resources could potentially reduce emissions by 90% or more (relative to 1990 levels) without reducing reliability or severely raising costs. Furthermore, policies that encourage electricity customers to shift demand to times when renewable power is most abundant (for example, though the well-timed charging of electric vehicles) could achieve radical emission reductions at moderate cost.[74]

SWITCH was used more recently to underpin consensus-based power system planning in Hawaii.[75] The model is also being applied in Chile, Mexico, and elsewhere.[76]

Major version 2.0 was released in late‑2018.[76] An investigation that year favorably compared SWITCH with the proprietary General Electric MAPS model using Hawaii as a case study.[77]


URBS, Latin for city, is a linear programming model for exploring capacity expansion and unit commitment problems and is particularly suited to distributed energy systems (DES). It is being developed by the Institute for Renewable and Sustainable Energy Systems, Technical University of Munich, Germany. The codebase is hosted on GitHub. URBS is written in Python and uses the Pyomo optimization packages.

URBS classes as an energy modeling framework and attempts to minimize the total discounted cost of the system. A particular model selects from a set of technologies to meet a predetermined electricity demand. It uses a time resolution of one hour and the spatial resolution is model-defined. The decision variables are the capacities for the production, storage, and transport of electricity and the time scheduling for their operation.[78]:11–14

The software has been used to explore cost-optimal extensions to the European transmission grid using projected wind and solar capacities for 2020. A 2012 study, using high spatial and technological resolutions, found variable renewable energy (VRE) additions cause lower revenues for conventional power plants and that grid extensions redistribute and alleviate this effect.[79] The software has also been used to explore energy systems spanning Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa (EUMENA)[78] and Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore.[80]

Energy system models

Open energy system models capture some or all of the energy commodities found in an energy system. Typically models of the electricity sector are always included. Some models add the heat sector, which can be important for countries with significant district heating. Other models add gas networks. With the advent of emobility, other models still include aspects of the transport sector. Indeed, coupling these various sectors using power-to-X technologies is an emerging area of research.[37]

Open energy system models (bottom-up, with support for heat, gas, and such, as well as electricity)
Project Host License Access Coding Documentation Scope/type
Balmorel Denmark ISC registration GAMS manual energy markets
Calliope ETH Zurich Apache 2.0 download Python manual, website, list dispatch and investment
DESSTinEE Imperial College London CC BY-SA 3.0 download Excel/VBA website simulation
Energy Transition Model Quintel Intelligence MIT GitHub Ruby (on Rails) website web-based
EnergyPATHWAYS Evolved Energy Research MIT GitHub Python website mostly simulation
ETEM ORDECSYS, Switzerland Eclipse 1.0 registration MathProg manual municipal
ficus Technical University of Munich GPLv3 GitHub Python manual local electricity and heat
oemof oemof community supported by

·         Reiner Lemoine Institute

·         University of Flensburg

·         Flensburg University of Applied Sciences

GPLv3 GitHub Python website framework – dispatch, investment, all sectors, LP/MILP
OSeMOSYS OSeMOSYS community Apache 2.0 GitHub ·         GAMS

·         MathProg

·         Python

website, forum planning at all scales
PyPSA Goethe University Frankfurt GPLv3 GitHub Python website electric power systems with sector coupling
TEMOA North Carolina State University GPLv2+ GitHub Python website, forum system planning
·         Access refers to the methods offered for accessing the codebase.


Balmorel is a market-based energy system model from Denmark. Development was originally financed by the Danish Energy Research Program in 2001.[64]:23 The codebase was made public in March 2001.[81] The Balmorel project maintains an extensive website, from where the codebase and datasets can be download as a zip file. Users are encouraged to register. Documentation is available from the same site.[82][83][84] Balmorel is written in GAMS.

The original aim of the Balmorel project was to construct a partial equilibrium model of the electricity and CHP sectors in the Baltic Sea region, for the purposes of policy analysis.[85] These ambitions and limitations have long since been superseded and Balmorel is no longer tied to its original geography and policy questions.[83] Balmorel classes as a dispatch and investment model and uses a time resolution of one hour. It models electricity and heat supply and demand, and supports the intertemporal storage of both. Balmorel is structured as a pure linear program (no integer variables).

As of 2016, Balmorel has been the subject of some 22 publications. A 2008 study uses Balmorel to explore the Nordic energy system in 2050. The focus is on renewable energy supply and the deployment of hydrogen as the main transport fuel. Given certain assumptions about the future price of oil and carbon and the uptake of hydrogen, the model shows that it is economically optimal to cover, using renewable energy, more than 95% of the primary energy consumption for electricity and district heat and 65% of the transport.[86] A 2010 study uses Balmorel to examine the integration of plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEV) into a system comprising one quarter wind power and three quarters thermal generation. The study shows that PHEVs can reduce the CO
2 emissions from the power system if actively integrated, whereas a hands-off approach – letting people charge their cars at will – is likely to result in an increase in emissions.[87] A 2013 study uses Balmorel to examine cost-optimized wind power investments in the Nordic-Germany region. The study investigates the best placement of wind farms, taking into account wind conditions, distance to load, and the generation and transmission infrastructure already in place.[88]


Calliope is an energy system modeling framework, with a focus on flexibility, high spatial and temporal resolution, and the ability to execute different runs using the same base-case dataset. The project is being developed at the Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. The project maintains a website, hosts the codebase at GitHub, operates an issues tracker, and runs two email lists. Calliope is written in Python and uses the Pyomo library. It can link to the open source GLPK solver and the commercial CPLEX and Gurobi solvers. PDF documentation is available.[89]

A Calliope model consists of a collection of structured text files, in YAML and CSV formats, that define the technologies, locations, and resource potentials. Calliope takes these files, constructs a pure linear optimization (no integer variables) problem, solves it, and reports the results in the form of pandas data structures for analysis. The framework contains five abstract base technologies – supply, demand, conversion, storage, transmission – from which new concrete technologies can be derived. The design of Calliope enforces the clear separation of framework (code) and model (data).

A 2015 study uses Calliope to compare the future roles of nuclear power and CSP in South Africa. It finds CSP could be competitive with nuclear by 2030 for baseload and more competitive when producing above baseload. CSP also offers less investment risk, less environmental risk, and other co-benefits.[90] A second 2015 study compares a large number of cost-optimal future power systems for Great Britain. Three generation technologies are tested: renewables, nuclear power, and fossil fuels with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS). The scenarios are assessed on financial cost, emissions reductions, and energy security. Up to 60% of variable renewable capacity is possible with little increase in cost, while higher shares require large-scale storage, imports, and/or dispatchable renewables such as tidal range.[91]


DESSTinEE stands for Demand for Energy Services, Supply and Transmission in EuropE. DESSTinEE is a model of the European energy system in 2050 with a focus on the electricity system. DESSTinEE is being developed primarily at the Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London (ICL), London, United Kingdom. The software can be downloaded from the project website. DESSTinEE is written in Excel/VBA and comprises a set of standalone spreadsheets. A flier is available.[92]

DESSTinEE is designed to investigate assumptions about the technical requirements for energy transport – particularly electricity – and the scale of the economic challenge to develop the necessary infrastructure. Forty countries are considered in and around Europe and ten forms of primary and secondary energy are supported. The model uses a predictive simulation technique, rather than solving for either partial or general equilibrium. The model projects annual energy demands for each country to 2050, synthesizes hourly profiles for electricity demand in 2010 and 2050, and simulates the least-cost generation and transmission of electricity around the region.[93]

A 2016 study using DESSTinEE (and a second model eLOAD) examines the evolution of electricity load curves in Germany and Britain from the present until 2050. In 2050, peak loads and ramp rates rise 20–60% and system utilization falls 15–20%, in part due to the substantial uptake of heat pumps and electric vehicles. These are significant changes.[94]

Energy Transition Model

The Energy Transition Model (ETM) is an interactive web-based model using a holistic description of a country’s energy system. It is being developed by Quintel Intelligence, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The project maintains a project website, an interactive website, and a GitHub repository. ETM is written in Ruby (on Rails) and displays in a web browser. ETM consists of several software components as described in the documentation.

ETM is fully interactive. After selecting a region (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, EU-27, or Brazil) and a year (2020, 2030, 2040, or 2050), the user can set 300 sliders (or enter numerical values) to explore the following:

  • targets: set goals for the scenario and see if they can be achieved, targets comprise: CO
    2reductions, renewables shares, total cost, and caps on imports
  • demands: expand or restrict energy demand in the future
  • costs: project the future costs of energy carriers and energy technologies, these costs do not include taxes or subsidies
  • supplies: select which technologies can be used to produce heat or electricity

ETM is based on an energy graph (digraph) where nodes (vertices) can convert from one type of energy to another, possibly with losses. The connections (directed edges) are the energy flows and are characterized by volume (in megajoules) and carrier type (such as coal, electricity, usable-heat, and so forth). Given a demand and other choices, ETM calculates the primary energy use, the total cost, and the resulting CO
2 emissions. The model is demand driven, meaning that the digraph is traversed from useful demand (such as space heating, hot water usage, and car-kilometers) to primary demand (the extraction of gas, the import of coal, and so forth).


EnergyPATHWAYS is a bottom-up energy sector model used to explore the near-term implications of long-term deep decarbonization. The lead developer is energy and climate protection consultancy, Evolved Energy Research, San Francisco, USA. The code is hosted on GitHub. EnergyPATHWAYS is written in Python and links to the open source Cbc solver. Alternatively, the GLPK, CPLEX, or Gurobi solvers can be employed. EnergyPATHWAYS utilizes the PostgreSQL object-relational database management system (ORDBMS) to manage its data.

EnergyPATHWAYS is a comprehensive accounting framework used to construct economy-wide energy infrastructure scenarios. While portions of the model do use linear programming techniques, for instance, for electricity dispatch, the EnergyPATHWAYS model is not fundamentally an optimization model and embeds few decision dynamics. EnergyPATHWAYS offers detailed energy, cost, and emissions accounting for the energy flows from primary supply to final demand. The energy system representation is flexible, allowing for differing levels of detail and the nesting of cities, states, and countries. The model uses hourly least-cost electricity dispatch and supports power-to-gas, short-duration energy storage, long-duration energy storage, and demand response. Scenarios typically run to 2050.

A predecessor of the EnergyPATHWAYS software, named simply PATHWAYS, has been used to construct policy models. The California PATHWAYS model was used to inform Californian state climate targets for 2030.[95] And the US PATHWAYS model contributed to the UN Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP) assessments for the United States.[96] As of 2016, the DDPP plans to employ EnergyPATHWAYS for future analysis.


ETEM stands for Energy Technology Environment Model. The ETEM model offers a similar structure to OSeMOSYS but is aimed at urban planning. The software is being developed by the ORDECSYS company, Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland, supported with European Union and national research grants. The project has two websites. The software can be downloaded from first of these websites (but as of July 2016, this looks out of date). A manual is available with the software.[97] ETEM is written in MathProg.[e] Presentations describing ETEM are available.[98][99]

ETEM is a bottom-up model that identifies the optimal energy and technology options for a regional or city. The model finds an energy policy with minimal cost, while investing in new equipment (new technologies), developing production capacity (installed technologies), and/or proposing the feasible import/export of primary energy. ETEM typically casts forward 50 years, in two or five year steps, with time slices of four seasons using typically individual days or finer. The spatial resolution can be highly detailed. Electricity and heat are both supported, as are district heating networks, household energy systems, and grid storage, including the use of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). ETEM-SG, a development, supports demand response, an option which would be enabled by the development of smart grids.

The ETEM model has been applied to Luxembourg, the Geneva and Basel-Bern-Zurich cantons in Switzerland, and the Grenoble metropolitan and Midi-Pyrénées region in France. A 2005 study uses ETEM to study climate protection in the Swiss housing sector. The ETEM model was coupled with the GEMINI-E3 world computable general equilibrium model (CGEM) to complete the analysis.[100] A 2012 study examines the design of smart grids. As distribution systems become more intelligent, so must the models needed to analysis them. ETEM is used to assess the potential of smart grid technologies using a case study, roughly calibrated on the Geneva canton, under three scenarios. These scenarios apply different constraints on CO
2 emissions and electricity imports. A stochastic approach is used to deal with the uncertainty in future electricity prices and the uptake of electric vehicles.[101]


ficus is a mixed integer optimization model for local energy systems. It is being developed at the Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. The project maintains a website. The project is hosted on GitHub. ficus is written in Python and uses the Pyomo library. The user can choose between the open source GLPK solver or the commercial CPLEX and Gurobi solvers.

Based on URBS, ficus was originally developed for optimizing the energy systems of factories and has now been extended to include local energy systems. ficus supports multiple energy commodities – goods that can be imported or exported, generated, stored, or consumed – including electricity and heat. It supports multiple-input and multiple-output energy conversion technologies with load-dependent efficiencies. The objective of the model is to supply the given demand at minimal cost. ficus uses exogenous cost time series for imported commodities as well as peak demand charges with a configurable timebase for each commodity in use.


oemof stands for Open Energy Modelling Framework. The project is managed by the Reiner Lemoine Institute, Berlin, Germany and the Center for Sustainable Energy Systems (CSES or ZNES) at the University of Flensburg and the Flensburg University of Applied Sciences, both Flensburg, Germany. The project runs two websites and a GitHub repository. oemof is written in Python and uses Pyomo and COIN-OR components for optimization. Energy systems can be represented using spreadsheets (CSV) which should simplify data preparation. Version 0.1.0 was released on 1 December 2016.

oemof classes as an energy modeling framework. It consists of a linear or mixed integer optimization problem formulation library (solph), an input data generation library (feedin-data), and other auxiliary libraries. The solph library is used to represent multi-regional and multi-sectoral (electricity, heat, gas, mobility) systems and can optimize for different targets, such as financial cost or CO
2 emissions. Furthermore, it is possible to switch between dispatch and investment modes. In terms of scope, oemof can capture the European power system or alternatively it can describe a complex local power and heat sector scheme.


OSeMOSYS stands for Open Source Energy Modelling System. OSeMOSYS is intended for national and regional policy development and uses an intertemperal optimization framework. The model posits a single socially motivated operator/investor with perfect foresight. The OSeMOSYS project is a community endeavor, supported by the Energy Systems Analysis Group (dESA), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. The project maintains a website providing background. The project also offers several active internet forums on Reddit. OSeMOSYS was originally written in MathProg, a high-level mathematical programming language. It was subsequently reimplemented in GAMS and Python and all three codebases are now maintained. The project also provides a test model called UTOPIA.[102] A manual is available.[103]

OSeMOSYS provides a framework for the analysis of energy systems over the medium (10–15 years) and long term (50–100 years). OSeMOSYS uses pure linear optimization, with the option of mixed integer programming for the treatment of, for instance, discrete power plant capacity expansions. It covers most energy sectors, including heat, electricity, and transport. OSeMOSYS is driven by exogenously defined energy services demands. These are then met through a set of technologies which draw on a set of resources, both characterized by their potentials and costs. These resources are not limited to energy commodities and may include, for example, water and land-use. This enables OSeMOSYS to be applied in domains other than energy, such as water systems. Technical constraints, economic restrictions, and/or environmental targets may also be imposed to reflect policy considerations. OSeMOSYS is available in extended and compact MathProg formulations, either of which should give identical results. In its extended version, OSeMOSYS comprises a little more than 400 lines of code.

A key paper describing OSeMOSYS is available.[5] A 2011 study uses OSeMOSYS to investigate the role of household investment decisions.[104] A 2012 study extends OSeMOSYS to capture the salient features of a smart grid. The paper explains how to model variability in generation, flexible demand, and grid storage and how these impact on the stability of the grid.[105] OSeMOSYS has been applied to village systems. A 2015 paper compares the merits of stand-alone, mini-grid, and grid electrification for rural areas in Timor-Leste under differing levels of access.[106] In a 2016 study, OSeMOSYS is modified to take into account realistic consumer behavior.[107] Another 2016 study uses OSeMOSYS to build a local multi-regional energy system model of the Lombardy region in Italy. One of the aims of the exercise was to encourage citizens to participate in the energy planning process. Preliminary results indicate that this was successful and that open modeling is needed to properly include both the technological dynamics and the non-technological issues.[108] A 2017 paper covering Alberta, Canada factors in the risk of overrunning specified emissions targets because of technological uncertainty. Among other results, the paper finds that solar and wind technologies are built out seven and five years earlier respectively when emissions risks are included.[109] Another 2017 paper analyses the electricity system in Cyprus and finds that, after European Union environmental regulations are applied post-2020, a switch from oil-fired to natural gas generation is indicated.[110]

OSeMOSYS has been used to construct wide-area electricity models for Africa, comprising 45 countries[111][112] and South America, comprising 13 countries.[113][114] It has also been used to support United Nations’ regional climate, land, energy, and water strategies (CLEWS)[115] for the Sava river basin, central Europe,[116] the Syr Darya river basin, eastern Europe,[117]:29 and Mauritius.[118] Models have previously been built for the Baltic States, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Sweden.

In 2016, work started on a browser-based interface to OSeMOSYS, known as the Model Management Infrastructure (MoManI). Lead by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), MoManI is being trialled in selected countries. The interface can be used to construct models, visualize results, and develop better scenarios. Atlantis is the name of a fictional country case-study for training purposes.[119][120][121]

The OSeMBE reference model covering western and central Europe was announced on 27 April 2018.[122][123] The model uses the MathProg implemention of OSeMOSYS but requires a small patch first. The model, funded as part of Horizon 2020 and falling under work package WP7 of the REEEM project, will be used to help stakeholders engage with a range of sustainable energy futures for Europe.[124] The REEEM project runs from early-2016 till mid-2020.


PyPSA stands for Python for Power System Analysis. PyPSA is a free software toolbox for simulating and optimizing electric power systems and allied sectors. It supports conventional generation, variable wind and solar generation, electricity storage, coupling to the natural gas, hydrogen, heat, and transport sectors, and hybrid alternating and direct current networks. Moreover, PyPSA is designed to scale well. The project is managed by the Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics (IAI), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany, although the project itself exists independently under its own name and accounts. The project maintains a website and runs an email list. PyPSA itself is written in Python and uses the Pyomo library. The source code is hosted on GitHub and is also released periodically as a PyPI package.

The basic functionality of PyPSA is described in a 2018 paper. PyPSA sits between traditional steady-state power flow analysis software and full multi-period energy system models. It can be invoked using either non-linear power flow equations for system simulation or linearized approximations to enable the joint optimization of operations and investment across multiple periods. Generator ramping and multi-period up and down-times can be specified, DSM is supported, but demand remains price inelastic.[125]

A 2018 study examines potential synergies between sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a future European energy system constrained to reduce carbon emissions by 95%. The PyPSA-Eur-Sec-30 model captures the demand-side management potential of battery electric vehicles (BEV) as well as the role that power-to-gas, long-term thermal energy storage, and related technologies can play. Results indicate that BEVs can smooth the daily variations in solar power while the remaining technologies smooth the synoptic and seasonal variations in both demand and renewable supply. Substantial buildout of the electricity grid is required for a least-cost configuration. More generally, such a system is both feasible and affordable. The underlying datasets are available from Zenodo.[126]

As of January 2018, PyPSA is used by more than a dozen research institutes and companies worldwide.[125]:2 Some research groups have independently extended the software, for instance to model integer transmission expansion.[127] On 9 January 2019, the project released an interactive web-interfaced “toy” model, using the Cbc solver, to allow the public to experiment with different future costs and technologies. Each run takes about 40 s.[128][129]


TEMOA stands for Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis. The software is being developed by the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. The project runs a website and a forum. The source code is hosted on GitHub. The model is programmed in Pyomo, an optimization components library written in Python. TEMOA can be used with any solver that Pyomo supports, including the open source GLPK solver. TEMOA uses version control to publicly archive source code and datasets and thereby enable third-parties to verify all published modeling work.[8]

TEMOA classes as a modeling framework and is used to conduct analysis using a bottom-up, technology rich energy system model. The model objective is to minimize the system-wide cost of energy supply by deploying and utilizing energy technologies and commodities over time to meet a set of exogenously specified end-use demands.[130] TEMOA is “strongly influenced by the well-documented MARKAL/TIMES model generators”.[131]:4


Programming components

Component models

A number of technical component models are now also open source. While these component models do not constitute systems models aimed at public policy development (the focus of this page), they nonetheless warrant a mention. Component models can be linked or otherwise adapted into these broader initiatives.

  • Sandia photovoltaic array performance model[133]

A number of electricity auction models have been written in GAMS, AMPL, MathProg, and other languages.[g] These include:

  • the EPOC nodal pricing model[134]
  • vSPD nodal pricing model[135]
  • Australian National Electricity Market examples using MathProg can be found at wikibooks:GLPK/Electricity markets

Open solvers

Many projects rely on a pure linear or mixed integer solver to perform classical optimization, constraint satisfaction, or some mix of the two. While there are several open source solver projects, the most commonly deployed solver is GLPK. GLPK has been adopted by Calliope, ETEM, ficus, OSeMOSYS, SWITCH, and TEMOA. Another alternative is the Clp solver.[136][137] Proprietary solvers outperform open source solvers by a considerable margin (perhaps ten-fold), so choosing an open solver will limit performance in terms of both speed and memory consumption.[138]


  1. ^ Jump up to:ab acatech; Lepoldina; Akademienunion, eds. (2016). Consulting with energy scenarios: requirements for scientific policy advice (PDF). Berlin, Germany: acatech — National Academy of Science and Engineering. ISBN 978-3-8047-3550-7. Retrieved 19 December2016.
  2. ^Cite error: The named reference bazilian-etal-2012 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^Morin, Andrew; Urban, Jennifer; Sliz, Piotr (26 July 2012). “A quick guide to software licensing for the scientist-programmer”. PLOS Computational Biology. 8 (7): e1002598. Bibcode:2012PLSCB…8E2598M. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002598. ISSN 1553-7358. PMC 3406002. PMID 22844236.
  4. ^ Jump up to:ab c Pfenninger, Stefan; DeCarolis, Joseph; Hirth, Lion; Quoilin, Sylvain; Staffell, Iain (February 2017). “The importance of open data and software: is energy research lagging behind?”. Energy Policy. 101: 211–215. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.046. ISSN 0301-4215.
  5. ^ Jump up to:ab Howells, Mark; Rogner, Holger; Strachan, Neil; Heaps, Charles; Huntington, Hillard; Kypreos, Socrates; Hughes, Alison; Silveira, Semida; DeCarolis, Joe; Bazilian, Morgan; Roehrl, Alexander (2011). “OSeMOSYS: the open source energy modeling system : an introduction to its ethos, structure and development”. Energy Policy. 39 (10): 5850–5870. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033. The name Morgan Bazillian has been corrected. ResearchGate version.
  6. ^Mundaca, Luis; Neij, Lena; Worrell, Ernst; McNeil, Michael A (1 August 2010). “Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models — Report number LBNL-3862E”(PDF). Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Berkeley, CA, US: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-052810-164840. OSTI 1001644. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
  7. ^Mundaca, Luis; Neij, Lena; Worrell, Ernst; McNeil, Michael A (22 October 2010). “Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 35 (1): 305–344. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-052810-164840. ISSN 1543-5938.
  8. ^ Jump up to:ab DeCarolis, Joseph F; Hunter, Kevin; Sreepathi, Sarat (2012). “The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models” (PDF). Energy Economics. 34 (6): 1845–1853. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.004. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  9. ^Cao, Karl-Kiên; Cebulla, Felix; Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J; Mousavi, Babak; Prehofer, Sigrid (28 September 2016). “Raising awareness in model-based energy scenario studies — a transparency checklist”. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 6 (1): 28–47. doi:10.1186/s13705-016-0090-z. ISSN 2192-0567.
  10. ^ Jump up to:ab Pfenninger, Stefan (23 February 2017). “Energy scientists must show their workings” (PDF). Nature News. 542 (7642): 393. Bibcode:2017Natur.542..393P. doi:10.1038/542393a. PMID 28230147. Retrieved 26 February 2017.
  11. ^“SET-Plan update” (PDF). SETIS Magazine (13): 5–7. November 2016. ISSN 2467-382X. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  12. ^“Medeas: modeling the renewable energy transition in Europe”. Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  13. ^Howells, Mark (November 2016). “OSeMOSYS: open source software for energy modelling” (PDF). SETIS Magazine (13): 37–38. ISSN 2467-382X. Retrieved 1 March2017.
  14. ^Simoes, Sofia; Nijs, Wouter; Ruiz, Pablo; Sgobbi, Alessandra; Radu, Daniela; Bolat, Pelin; Thiel, Christian; Peteves, Stathis (2013). The JRC-EU-TIMES model: assessing the long-term role of the SET Plan energy technologies — LD-NA-26292-EN-N (PDF). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2790/97596. ISBN 978-92-79-34506-7. ISSN 1831-9424. Retrieved 3 March 2017. The DOI, ISBN, and ISSN refer to the online version.
  15. ^ Jump up to:ab Zerrahn, Alexander; Schill, Wolf-Peter (2015). A greenfield model to evaluate long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables — DIW discussion paper 1457 (PDF). Berlin, Germany: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW). ISSN 1619-4535. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  16. ^Zerrahn, Alexander; Schill, Wolf-Peter (2017). “Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: review and a new model”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 79: 1518–1534. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.098.
  17. ^Schill, Wolf-Peter; Niemeyer, Moritz; Zerrahn, Alexander; Diekmann, Jochen (1 June 2016). “Bereitstellung von Regelleistung durch Elektrofahrzeuge: Modellrechnungen für Deutschland im Jahr 2035”. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (in German). 40 (2): 73–87. doi:10.1007/s12398-016-0174-7. hdl:10419/165995. ISSN 0343-5377.
  18. ^Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander; Kunz, Friedrich (1 June 2017). “Prosumage of solar electricity: pros, cons, and the system perspective” (PDF). Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy. 6 (1). doi:10.5547/2160-5890.6.1.wsch. ISSN 2160-5882.
  19. ^Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (2017). “Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: Results and sensitivities”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 83: 156–171. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.205.
  20. ^Hidalgo González, Ignacio; Quoilin, Sylvain; Zucker, Andreas (2014). Dispa-SET 2.0: unit commitment and power dispatch model: description, formulation, and implementation — EUR 27015 EN (PDF). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2790/399921. ISBN 978-92-79-44690-0. Retrieved 1 March 2017. The DOI and ISBN refer to the online version.
  21. ^ Jump up to:ab c d Quoilin, Sylvain; Hidalgo González, Ignacio; Zucker, Andreas (2017). Modelling future EU power systems under high shares of renewables: the Dispa-SET 2.1 open-source model — EUR 28427 EN (PDF). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/25400. ISBN 978-92-79-65265-3. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  22. ^ Jump up to:ab “Dispa-SET documentation”. Retrieved 2 March 2017. Automatically the latest version.
  23. ^“SET-Plan Update” (PDF). SETIS Magazine (13): 5–7. November 2016. ISSN 2467-382X. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  24. ^Hidalgo González, Ignacio; Ruiz Castello, Pablo; Sgobbi, Alessandra; Nijs, Wouter; Quoilin, Sylvain; Zucker, Andreas; Thiel, Christian (2015). Addressing flexibility in energy system models — EUR 27183 EN (PDF) (Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2790/925. ISBN 978-92-79-47235-0. Retrieved 2 March 2017.The DOI and ISBN refer to the online version.
  25. ^Quoilin, Sylvain; Nijs, Wouter; Hidalgo González, Ignacio; Zucker, Andreas; Thiel, Christian (19 May 2015). Evaluation of simplified flexibility evaluation tools using a unit commitment model. 2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). Energy Market, Eem, International Conference on the European. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/EEM.2015.7216757. ISBN 978-1-4673-6692-2. ISSN 2165-4077.
  26. ^Andersson, Göran (2008). Modelling and analysis of electric power systems: power flow analysis fault analysis power systems dynamics and stability (PDF). Zürich, Switzerland: ETH Zurich. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
  27. ^Quoilin, Sylvain; Hidalgo González, Ignacio; Zucker, Andreas; Thiel, Christian (September 2014). “Available technical flexibility for balancing variable renewable energy sources: case study in Belgium” (PDF). Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
  28. ^EMLab — Generation Factsheet (PDF). Delft, The Netherlands: Energy Modelling Lab, Delft University of Technology. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  29. ^de Vries, Laurens J; Chappin, Émile JL; Richstein, Jörn C (August 2015). EMLab-Generation: an experimentation environment for electricity policy analysis — Project report — Version 1.2 (PDF). Delft, The Netherlands: Energy Modelling Lab, Delft University of Technology. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  30. ^World energy outlook 2011 (PDF). Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA). 2011. ISBN 978-92-64-12413-4. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  31. ^Richstein, Jörn C; Chappin, Emile JL; de Vries, Laurens J (2014). “Cross-border electricity market effects due to price caps in an emission trading system: an agent-based approach”. Energy Policy. 71: 139–158. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.037.
  32. ^ Jump up to:ab Hirth, Lion (12 April 2016). The European Electricity Market Model EMMA — Model documentation — Version 2016-04-12 (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Neon Neue Energieökonomik. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  33. ^Hirth, Leon (2015). The economics of wind and solar variability: how the variability of wind and solar power affects their marginal value, optimal deployment, and integration costs — PhD thesis (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Technical University of Berlin. doi:10.14279/depositonce-4291. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  34. ^Hirth, Lion (2013). “The market value of variable renewables: the effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price” (PDF). Energy Economics. 38: 218–236. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004. hdl:1814/27135. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  35. ^Hirth, Leon (2015). “The optimal share of variable renewables: how the variability of wind and solar power affects their welfare-optimal deployment” (PDF). The Energy Journal. 36(1): 127–162. doi:10.5547/01956574.36.1.6. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  36. ^“The Project”. GENESYS project. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  37. ^ Jump up to:ab c Bussar, Christian; Moos, Melchior; Alvarez, Ricardo; Wolf, Philipp; Thien, Tjark; Chen, Hengsi; Cai, Zhuang; Leuthold, Matthias; Sauer, Dirk Uwe; Moser, Albert (2014). “Optimal allocation and capacity of energy storage systems in a future European power system with 100% renewable energy generation”. Energy Procedia. 46: 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.156.
  38. ^ Jump up to:ab Bussar, Christian; Stöcker, Philipp; Cai, Zhuang; Moraes Jr, Luiz; Magnor, Dirk; Wiernes, Pablo; van Bracht, Niklas; Moser, Albert; Sauer, Dirk Uwe (2016). “Large-scale integration of renewable energies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050 – Sensitivity study”. Journal of Energy Storage. 6: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004.
  39. ^“NEMO”. OzLabs. Australia. Retrieved 3 December 2016.
  40. ^ Jump up to:ab c Elliston, Ben; Diesendorf, Mark; MacGill, Iain (June 2012). “Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian National Electricity Market”. Energy Policy. 45: 606–613. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.011. ISSN 0301-4215. Retrieved 19 December 2016. Preprint URL given. This paper does not mention NEMO explicitly.
  41. ^ Jump up to:ab Elliston, Ben; Riesz, Jenny; MacGill, Iain (September 2016). “What cost for more renewables? The incremental cost of renewable generation — An Australian National Electricity Market case study” (PDF). Renewable Energy. 95: 127–139. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.080. ISSN 0960-1481. Retrieved 3 December 2016.Preprint URL given.
  42. ^Elliston, Ben; MacGill, Iain; Diesendorf, Mark (June 2014). “Comparing least cost scenarios for 100% renewable electricity with low emission fossil fuel scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market” (PDF). Renewable Energy. 66: 196–204. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.010. ISSN 0960-1481. Draft URL given.
  43. ^“OnSSET: open source spatial electrification tool”. OnSSET. Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  44. ^“OpeN Source Spatial Electrification Toolkit (OnSSET)”. Department of Energy Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved 5 December2016.
  45. ^Mentis, Dimitrios; Korkovelos, Alexandros; Shahid Siyal, Shahid; Paritosh, Deshpante; Broad, Oliver; Howells, Mark; Rogner, Holger (13 November 2015). Lighting up the world: the first global application of the open source, spatial electrification tool (OnSSET) — Presentation. 2015 International Workshop on Environment and Alternative Energy. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  46. ^ Jump up to:ab c Nerini, Francesco Fuso; Broad, Oliver; Mentis, Dimitris; Welsch, Manuel; Bazilian, Morgan; Howells, Mark (15 January 2016). “A cost comparison of technology approaches for improving access to electricity services”. Energy. 95: 255–265. doi:10.1016/ ISSN 0360-5442.
  47. ^ Jump up to:ab Berndtsson, Carl (2016). Open geospatial data for energy planning (MSc). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  48. ^Korkovelos, Alexandros; Bazilian, Morgan; Mentis, Dimitrios; Howells, Mark (2017). A GIS approach to planning electrification in Afghanistan. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
  49. ^Arderne, Christopher (June 2016). A climate, land-use, energy and water nexus assessment of Bolivia (PDF) (MSc). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  50. ^Mentis, Dimitrios; Andersson, Magnus; Howells, Mark; Rogner, Holger; Siyal, Shahid; Broad, Oliver; Korkovelos, Alexandros; Bazilian, Morgan (July 2016). “The benefits of geospatial planning in energy access: a case study on Ethiopia” (PDF). Applied Geography. 72: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.04.009. ISSN 0143-6228.
  51. ^Mentis, Dimitrios; Welsch, Manuel; Fuso Nerini, Francesco; Broad, Oliver; Howells, Mark; Bazilian, Morgan; Rogner, Holger (December 2015). “A GIS-based approach for electrification planning: a case study on Nigeria”. Energy for Sustainable Development. 29: 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2015.09.007. ISSN 0973-0826.
  52. ^“Universal electrification access”. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). New York, USA. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  53. ^International Energy Agency (2014). World Energy Outlook 2014 (PDF). Paris, France: OECD/IEA. ISBN 978-92-64-20805-6. Retrieved 9 March 2017.
  54. ^International Energy Agency (2015). World Energy Outlook 2015. Paris, France: OECD/IEA. ISBN 978-92-64-24366-8.
  55. ^International Energy Agency (IEA) and the World Bank (June 2015). Sustainable energy for all 2015: progress toward sustainable energy (PDF). Washington DC, USA: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0690-2. ISBN 978-1-4648-0690-2. Retrieved 9 March2017. Licensed under Creative Commons CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  56. ^International Energy Agency (IEA) (8 November 2019). Africa energy outlook. Paris, France: IEA Publications. No cost but registration required.
  57. ^“PYPOWER”. Python Software Foundation. Beaverton, OR, USA. Retrieved 2 December 2016.
  58. ^Scheidler, Alexander; Thurner, Leon; Kraiczy, Markus; Braun, Martin (14–15 November 2016). Automated grid planning for distribution grids with increasing PV penetration(PDF). 6th Solar Integration Workshop: International Workshop on Integration of Solar Power into Power Systems. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved 2 December 2016.
  59. ^Thurner, Leon; Scheidler, Alexander; Schäfer, Florian; Menke, Jan-Hendrik; Dollichon, Julian; Meier, Friederike; Meinecke, Steffen; Braun, Martin (2018). “Pandapower: an open source python tool for convenient modeling, analysis and optimization of electric power systems”. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 33 (6): 6510–6521. arXiv:1709.06743. Bibcode:2018ITPSy..33.6510T. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2829021. ISSN 0885-8950. The arXiv link given is for version 3.
  60. ^Thurner, Leon (4 May 2018). “pandapower news: reference paper published / unbalanced calculations / BNetzA adopts pandapower”. openmod-initiative (Mailing list). Retrieved 4 May 2018. We are especially proud to say that the German Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) is also adopting pandapower for automated grid analysis.
  61. ^Degner, Thomas; Rohrig, Kurt; Strauß, Philipp; Braun, Martin; Wurdinger, Kerstin; Korte, Klaas (22 March 2017). “Anforderungen an ein zukunftsfähiges Stromnetz” [Requirements for a sustainable power grid]. Forschung für die Energiewende – Die Gestaltung des Energiesystems Beiträge zur FVEE-Jahrestagung 2016 [Research for the energiewende — the design of the energy system contributions to the FVEE Annual Conference 2016] (PDF) (in German). Berlin, Germany: Forschungsverbund Erneuerbare Energien (FVEE). pp. 88–95. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  62. ^Kok, Koen (13 May 2013). The PowerMatcher: smart coordination for the smart electricity grid (PDF) (PhD). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  63. ^Wiese, Frauke (16 November 2014). renpass: Renewable Energy Pathways Simulation System — Manual (PDF). Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  64. ^ Jump up to:ab Wiese, Frauke (2015). renpass: Renewable Energy Pathways Simulation System: Open source as an approach to meet challenges in energy modeling (PDF) (PhD). Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8440-3705-0. Retrieved 12 July 2016.University of Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.
  65. ^Bernhardi, Nicolas; Bökenkamp, Gesine; Bons, Marian; Borrmann, Rasmus; Christ, Marion; Grüterich, Lauren; Heidtmann, Emilie; Jahn, Martin; Janssen, Tomke; Lesch, Jonas; Müller, Ulf Philipp; Pelda, Johannes; Stein, Isabelle; Veddeler, Eike; Voß, David; Wienholt, Lukas; Wiese, Frauke; Wingenbach, Clemens (November 2012). Modeling sustainable electricity systems for the Baltic Sea region — Discussion paper 3 (PDF). Flensburg, Germany: Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems (CSES), University of Flensburg. ISSN 2192-4597. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  66. ^Wiechers, Eva; Böhm, Hendrik; Bunke, Wolf Dieter; Kaldemeyer, Cord; Kummerfeld, Tim; Söthe, Martin; Thiesen, Henning (2014). Modelling sustainable electricity systems for Germany and neighbours in 2050. Flensburg, Germany: Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems (CSES), University of Flensburg.
  67. ^Bökenkamp, Gesine (October 2014). The role of Norwegian hydro storage in future renewable electricity supply systems in Germany: analysis with a simulation model (PDF)(PhD). Flensburg, German: University of Flensburg. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  68. ^Wiese, Frauke; Bökenkamp, Gesine; Wingenbach, Clemens; Hohmeyer, Olav (2014). “An open source energy system simulation model as an instrument for public participation in the development of strategies for a sustainable future”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 3 (5): 490–504. doi:10.1002/wene.109. ISSN 2041-840X.
  69. ^Matke, Carsten; Medjroubi, Wided; Kleinhans, David (2015). SciGRID: an open source model of the European power transmission network — Poster (PDF). Mathematics and Physics of Multilayer Complex Networks. Dresden, Germany. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  70. ^Wiegmans, Bart (2015). Improving the topology of an electric network model based on Open Data (PDF) (MSc). Groningen, The Netherlands: Energy and Sustainability Research Institute, University of Groningen. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  71. ^Wiegmans, Bart (2016). “GridKit: European and North-American extracts”. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.47317. Retrieved 6 December 2016. |chapter= ignored (help)
  72. ^Bosilovich, Michael G; Lucches, Rob; Suarez, M (12 March 2016). MERRA-2: File specification — GMAO Office Note No. 9 (Version 1.1) (PDF). Greenbelt, Maryland, USA: Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO), Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  73. ^Rose, Ben (April 2016). Clean electricity Western Australia 2030: modelling renewable energy scenarios for the South West Integrated System (PDF). West Perth, WA, Australia: Sustainable Energy Now. Retrieved 5 December 2017.
  74. ^Fripp, Matthius (2012). “Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy” (PDF). Environmental Science and Technology. 46 (11): 6371–6378. Bibcode:2012EnST…46.6371F. doi:10.1021/es204645c. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 22506835. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  75. ^Fripp, Matthias (29 June 2016). Consensus-based power system planning using open assumptions and models — Presentation (PDF). Manoa, Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  76. ^ Jump up to:ab Johnston, Josiah; Henríquez, Rodrigo; Maluenda, Benjamín; Fripp, Matthias (17 October 2018). “Switch 2.0: a modern platform for planning high-renewable power systems”. SoftwareX. 10: 100251. arXiv:1804.05481. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2019.100251. arXiv preprint v3. The release date for 2.0.0 was 1 August 2018 under GitHub commit fc19cfe.
  77. ^Fripp, Matthias (27 December 2018). “Intercomparison between Switch 2.0 and GE MAPS models for simulation of high-renewable power systems in Hawaii”. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 8 (1): 41. doi:10.1186/s13705-018-0184-x. ISSN 2192-0567.
  78. ^ Jump up to:ab Huber, Matthias; Dorfner, Johannes; Hamacher, Thomas (18 January 2012). Electricity system optimization in the EUMENA region — Technical report (PDF). Munich, Germany: Institute for Energy Economy and Application Technology, Technical University of Munich. doi:10.14459/2013md1171502. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  79. ^Schaber, Katrin; Steinke, Florian; Hamacher, Thomas (April 2012). “Transmission grid extensions for the integration of variable renewable energies in Europe: who benefits where?”. Energy Policy. 43: 123–135. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.040.
  80. ^Stich, Juergen; Mannhart, Melanie; Zipperle, Thomas; Massier, Tobias; Huber, Matthias; Hamacher, Thomas (2014). Modelling a low-carbon power system for Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (PDF). 33rd IEW International Energy Workshop, Peking, China. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  81. ^Personal email from Hans Ravn dated 11 December 2016. This makes Balmorel the first open energy modeling project to go public by quite a margin.
  82. ^Ravn, Hans F (March 2001). The Balmorel model: theoretical background (PDF). Balmorel Project. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  83. ^ Jump up to:ab Ravn, Hans F (2 July 2012). The Balmorel model structure — Version 3.02 (September 2011) (PDF). Balmorel Project. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  84. ^Grohnheit, Poul Erik; Larsen, Helge V (March 2001). Balmorel: data and calibration — Version 2.05 (PDF). Balmorel Project. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  85. ^Ravn, Hans F; et al. (2001). Balmorel: a model for analyses of the electricity and CHP markets in the Baltic Sea region (PDF). Denmark: Balmorel Project. ISBN 87-986969-3-9. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  86. ^Karlsson, Kenneth Bernard; Meibom, Peter (2008). “Optimal investment paths for future renewable based energy systems: using the optimisation model Balmorel”. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33 (7): 1777–1787. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.031.
  87. ^Göransson, Lisa; Karlsson, Sten; Johnsson, Filip (October 2010). “Integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in a regional wind-thermal power system”. Energy Policy. 38 (10): 5482–5492. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.001.
  88. ^Göransson, Lisa; Johnsson, Filip (May 2013). “Cost-optimized allocation of wind power investments: a Nordic-German perspective”. Wind Energy. 16 (4): 587–604. Bibcode:2013WiEn…16..587G. doi:10.1002/we.1517.
  89. ^Pfenninger, Stefan (10 March 2016). Calliope documentation — Release 0.3.7 (PDF). Retrieved 11 July 2016. The release version may be updated.
  90. ^Pfenninger, Stefan; Keirstead, James (2015). “Comparing concentrating solar and nuclear power as baseload providers using the example of South Africa”. Energy. 87: 303–314. doi:10.1016/
  91. ^Pfenninger, Stefan; Keirstead, James (2015). “Renewables, nuclear, or fossil fuels? Scenarios for Great Britain’s power system considering costs, emissions and energy security”. Applied Energy. 152: 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.102.
  92. ^DESSTinEE: an energy transfer reference case (PDF). 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  93. ^“DESSTinEE”. Open Energy Modelling Initiative. Retrieved 3 December 2016. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
  94. ^Boßmann, Tobias; Staffell, Iain (2016). “The shape of future electricity demand: exploring load curves in 2050s Germany and Britain”. Energy. 90 (20): 1317–1333. doi:10.1016/ hdl:10044/1/25173.
  95. ^Williams, James H; DeBenedictis, Andrew; Ghanadan, Rebecca; Mahone, Amber; Moore, Jack; Morrow, William R; Price, Snuller; Torn, Margaret S (2012). “The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity”. Science. 335(6064): 53–59. Bibcode:2012Sci…335…53W. doi:10.1126/science.1208365. PMID 22116030. See also published correction.
  96. ^“The US Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (USDDPP)”. New York, NY, USA: Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP). Retrieved 6 December 2016.
  97. ^Drouet, Laurent; Thénié, Julie (2009). ETEM: an energy–technology–environment model to assess urban sustainable development policies — Reference manual version 2.1. Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland: ORDECSYS (Operations Research Decisions and Systems). This PDF is part of the software bundle.
  98. ^Drouet, Laurent; Zachary, D (21 May 2010). Economic aspects of the ETEM model — Presentation (PDF). Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg: Resource Centre for Environmental Technologies, Public Research Centre Henri Tudor. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  99. ^Spatial simulation and optimization with ETEM-SG: Energy–Technology–Environment-Model for smart cities — Presentation (PDF). Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland: ORDECSYS. 2015. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  100. ^Drouet, Laurent; Haurie, Alain; Labriet, Maryse; Thalmann, Philippe; Vielle, Marc; Viguier, Laurent (2005). “A coupled bottom-up/top-down model for GHG abatement scenarios in the Swiss housing sector”. Energy and Environment. pp. 27–61. CiteSeerX doi:10.1007/0-387-25352-1_2. ISBN 0-387-25351-3.
  101. ^Babonneau, Frédéric; Haurie, Alain; Tarel, Guillaume Jean; Thénié, Julien (June 2012). “Assessing the future of renewable and smart grid technologies in regional energy systems” (PDF). Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES). 148 (2): 229–273. doi:10.1007/bf03399367. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  102. ^Cite error: The named reference lavigne-2017 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  103. ^Moksnes, Nandi; Welsch, Manuel; Gardumi, Francesco; Shivakumar, Abhishek; Broad, Oliver; Howells, Mark; Taliotis, Constantinos; Sridharan, Vignesh (November 2015). 2015 OSeMOSYS user manual — Working Paper Series DESA/15/11 (PDF). Stockholm, Sweden: Division of Energy Systems Analysis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved 12 July 2016. The version referred to in the manual is OSeMOSYS_2013_05_10.
  104. ^Warren, Peter (23 September 2011). Incorporating behavioural complexity into the Open Source Energy Modelling System using intangible costs and benefits. People and Buildings. London, UK. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  105. ^Welsch, Manuel; Howells, Mark; Bazilian, Morgan; DeCarolis, Joseph F; Hermann, Sebastian; Rogner, Holger H (2012). “Modelling elements of smart grids: enhancing the OSeMOSYS (Open Source Energy Modelling System) code”. Energy. 46 (1): 337–350. doi:10.1016/
  106. ^Fuso Nerini, Francesco; Dargaville, Roger; Howells, Mark; Bazilian, Morgan (1 January 2015). “Estimating the cost of energy access: the case of the village of Suro Craic in Timor Leste”. Energy. 79: 385–397. doi:10.1016/ ISSN 0360-5442.
  107. ^Fragnière, Emmanuel; Kanala, Roman; Moresino, Francesco; Reveiu, Adriana; Smeureanu, Ion (2016). “Coupling techno-economic energy models with behavioral approaches” (PDF). Operational Research (2): 1–15. doi:10.1007/s12351-016-0246-9.
  108. ^Fattori, Fabrizio; Albini, Davide; Anglani, Norma (2016). “Proposing an open-source model for unconventional participation to energy planning”. Energy Research and Social Science. 15: 12–33. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.005.
  109. ^Niet, T; Lyseng, B; English, J; Keller, V; Palmer-Wilson, K; Moazzen, I; Robertson, B; Wild, P; Rowe, A (June 2017). “Hedging the risk of increased emissions in long term energy planning”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 16: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2017.02.001. ISSN 2211-467X.
  110. ^Taliotis, Constantinos; Rogner, Holger; Ressl, Stephan; Howells, Mark; Gardumi, Francesco (August 2017). “Natural gas in Cyprus: the need for consolidated planning”. Energy Policy. 107: 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.047. ISSN 0301-4215.
  111. ^Taliotis, Constantinos; Shivakumar, Abhishek; Ramos, Eunice; Howells, Mark; Mentis, Dimitris; Sridharan, Vignesh; Broad, Oliver; Mofor, Linus (April 2016). “An indicative analysis of investment opportunities in the African electricity supply sector — Using TEMBA (The Electricity Model Base for Africa)”. Energy for Sustainable Development. 31: 50–66. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2015.12.001. ISSN 0973-0826.
  112. ^“The Electricity Model Base for Africa (TEMBA)”. OSeMOSYS. Retrieved 13 January2017.
  113. ^Moura, Gustavo; Howells, Mark (August 2015). SAMBA: the open source South American model base: a Brazilian perspective on long term power systems investment and integration — Working paper dESA /5/8/11. Sockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3038.7042. Available for download from ResearchGate.
  114. ^“South American Model Base (SAMBA)”. OSeMOSYS. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  115. ^“Global CLEWS (Climate, Land, Energy, and Water Strategies)”. New York, USA: Division for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), United Nations. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  116. ^de Strasser, Lucia; Mentis, Dimitris; Ramos, Eunice; Sridharan, Vignesh; Welsch, Manuel; Howells, Mark; Destouni, Gia; Levi, Lea; Stec, Stephen; Roo, Ad de (2016). Reconciling resource uses in transboundary basins: assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus in the Sava River Basin (PDF). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Retrieved 17 March 2017.
  117. ^Reconciling resource uses in transboundary basins: assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus in the Syr Darya River basin (PDF). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  118. ^“Mauritius CLEWS (Climate, Land, Energy, and Water Strategies)”. New York, USA: Division for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), United Nations. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  119. ^Howells, Mark; Shivakumar, Abhishek; Pelakaukas, Martynas; Allmulla, Yousef; Gritsevskyi, Andrii (17 February 2016). Model Management Interface (MoManI) for OSeMOSYS: supporting development investments and INDCs — Presentation (PDF). Stockholm, Sweden and New York, USA: KTH Royal Institute of Technology and UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). Retrieved 17 January 2017.
  120. ^“Atlantis — Integrated Systems Analysis of Energy”. United Nations. New York, USA. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  121. ^United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). “Atlantis”. GitHub. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  122. ^OSeMOSYS (2018). “The open source energy model base for the European Union (OSeMBE)”. OSeMOSYS. Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
  123. ^Beltramo, Agnese (27 April 2018). “first OSeMBE EU-28 model released”. (Mailing list). Retrieved 30 April 2018.
  124. ^“REEEM – Energy Systems Modelling Project”. Modelling the transformation of the European Energy System. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  125. ^ Jump up to:ab c Brown, Tom; Hörsch, Jonas; Schlachtberger, David (16 January 2018). “PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis”. Journal of Open Research Software. 6 (1): 4. arXiv:1707.09913. doi:10.5334/jors.188. ISSN 2049-9647.
  126. ^Brown, Tom; Schlachtberger, David; Kies, Alexander; Schramm, Stefan; Greiner, Martin (1 October 2018). “Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system”. Energy. 160: 720–739. arXiv:1801.05290. Bibcode:2018arXiv180105290B. doi:10.1016/ ISSN 0360-5442.  Content identical arXiv postprint.
  127. ^Gorenstein Dedecca, João; Hakvoort, Rudi A; Herder, Paulien M (15 April 2017). “Transmission expansion simulation for the European Northern Seas offshore grid”. Energy. 125: 805–824. doi:10.1016/ ISSN 0360-5442.
  128. ^PyPSA contributors. “Meet constant demand from wind+solar+storage with zero-direct-emissions using your own assumptions”. PyPSA project. Retrieved 7 January 2019.Caveats apply.
  129. ^PyPSA constributors. “Online optimisation tool for wind+solar+storage systems: PyPSA/whobs-server”. PyPSA Project. Retrieved 7 January 2019. GitHub repository.
  130. ^Hunter, Kevin; Sreepathi, Sarat; DeCarolis, Joseph F (2013). “Modeling for insight using Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (TEMOA)” (PDF). Energy Economics. 40: 339–349. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.014. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  131. ^DeCarolis, Joseph; Hunter, Kevin; Sreepathi, Sarat (2010). The TEMOA project: Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (PDF). Raleigh, North Carolina, USA: Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  132. ^GAMS — Commercial Price List (PDF). 15 March 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  133. ^King, David L; Boyson, William E; Kratochvill, Jay A (2004). Photovoltaic array performance model — Sandia report SAND2004-3535 (PDF). USA: Sandia Corporation. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  134. ^Guan, Ziming; Philpott, Andy (2011). Modelling summary for the paper “Production inefficiency of electricity markets with hydro generation” (PDF). Auckland, New Zealand: Electric Power Optimization Centre (EPOC), University of Auckland. Retrieved 17 June2016.
  135. ^Naidoo, Ramu (2012). Vectorised schedule, pricing and dispatch (vSPD) v1.2: a guide to the Excel-based interface. Wellington, New Zealand: Electricity Authority New Zealand. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  136. ^“Clp homepage”. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
  137. ^“COIN-OR linear programming solver”. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
  138. ^Koch, Thorsten; Achterberg, Tobias; Andersen, Erling; Bastert, Oliver; Berthold, Timo; Bixby, Robert E; Danna, Emilie; Gamrath, Gerald; Gleixner, Ambros M (2011). “MIPLIB 2010: mixed integer programming library version 5”. Mathematical Programming Computation. 3 (2): 103–163. doi:10.1007/s12532-011-0025-9. Retrieved 17 June 2016.

Ofer Abarbanel – Executive Profile

Ofer Abarbanel online library

Ofer Abarbanel online library

Ofer Abarbanel online library